Home-worker’s perceptions of their workload and their ability to switch off after the working day are among a list of factors associated with health and well-being related behaviors.
New research from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London has found that home-worker’s perceptions of their workload and their ability to switch off after the working day are among a list of factors associated with health and well-being related behaviors.
The research, published in Behavioural Sciences, highlights how there can be clear positives to home-working when there are organizational policies in place that support practices conducive to a worker’s health and well-being.
The COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing lockdown led to a sharp rise in home-working among employees that would normally be office based. While extensive research has been conducted on promoting health and well-being among office workers, public health initiatives have largely overlooked the potential impact of home-working on health.
Researchers in this study wanted to establish the acute psychological effects of home-working on health and well-being related behaviors to better understand how these responses interact with one another.
In all, 491 participants were surveyed on a range of psychological responses to home-working practices and health-related behaviors, including measuring how capable home-workers were able to transform workspaces, the amount of time they remained sedentary during the working day, and the quality of their sleep. Analyses revealed the psychological responses to home-working practices could be grouped into four distinct clusters:
Home-working independence
Home-working transition
Daily work pressure
Work-day forecast
Dr. Samuel Keightley, the study’s first author from King’s IoPPN said, “This study illustrates that home-working exhibits similar but unique patterns, highlighting distinct responses to home-working practices that influence the health and well-being of home-based workers. These findings underscore the need to better understand and adjust home-working practices to support healthy behaviors and overall well-being.”
Researchers established a complex picture of associated behaviors. A worker’s perception of their workload manageability, an inability to feel like they can switch off in the evening, and a lack of autonomy all had cascading effects on health behaviors such as sitting and physical activity, and aspects of work-related well-being such as stress and burnout.
In contrast, participants who said that they were able to plan their working day had increased job satisfaction and well-being as well as a reduction in work-related and overall sedentary behavior.
Dr. Myanna Duncan, an Associate Professor in Occupational Psychology at King’s IoPPN and the study’s senior author said, “This study does not conclude that home working is inherently good or bad. Home-working has the potential to negatively impact certain health behaviors, which in the longer term could result in increased levels of stress and burnout.
“Equally, those participants who felt they had greater autonomy over their working day were associated with greater satisfaction and better health behaviors.
“If home working is to continue, it is vital that public health initiatives reflect the nuanced stressors that they can present to ensure that the benefits are maximized.”
More information:
Samuel Keightley et al, Psychological Responses to Home-Working Practices: A Network Analysis of Relationships with Health Behaviour and Wellbeing, Behavioral Sciences (2024). DOI: 10.3390/bs14111039
Citation:
Public health initiatives needed to promote healthy working at home, say researchers (2024, November 6)
retrieved 6 November 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-11-health-healthy-home.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
Firefighters work to control a blaze in California in July
ABACA/Shutterstock
2024 is now almost certain to become the first year on record when average temperatures exceed 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, breaching the threshold set by the Paris Agreement.
“At this point, barring an asteroid impact or a massive volcanic eruption… I think it’s safe to say this will be the first year above 1.5 degrees,” says Zeke Hausfather at US non-profit Berkeley Earth.
Last year, the average surface temperature across the globe was 1.45°C above the…
The International Space Station is viewed from a camera aboard the approaching SpaceX Dragon cargo spacecraft. The SpaceX Dragon Freedom crew spacecraft is pictured (at center) docked to the Harmony module’s space-facing port. Credit: NASA
After launching at 9:29 p.m. EST Nov. 4, the SpaceX Dragon capsule docked at the International Space Station at 9:52 a.m. EST Nov. 5. The spacecraft carried more than 6,000 pounds of scientific investigations and cargo to the orbiting laboratory on SpaceX’s 31st commercial resupply services mission for NASA.
Included in the payload is a technology demonstration called SEAQUE (Space Entanglement and Annealing Quantum Experiment). Developed at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, SEAQUE will experiment with technologies that, if successful, will enable communication on a quantum level using entanglement.
Researchers will focus on validating in space a new technology, enabling easier and more robust communication between two quantum systems across large distances. The research from this experiment could lead to developing building blocks for communicating between equipment such as quantum computers with enhanced security.
SEAQUE will be installed on the exterior of the space station using a Materials International Space Station Experiment (MISSE) mounting location.
More information:
Read more about the experiment here, and find out more about NASA’s SpaceX CRS-31 here.
Citation:
Quantum experiment arrives at space station aboard NASA’s SpaceX CRS-31 (2024, November 6)
retrieved 6 November 2024
from https://techxplore.com/news/2024-11-quantum-space-station-aboard-nasa.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
The weathered UC Davis Marine Laboratory looms in thick fog on the edge of the ocean near Bodega Bay. Inside, an experiment is playing out that gives a badly-needed boost to Northern California’s kelp forests—underwater cathedrals of green and gold that nearly vanished from the north coast a decade ago.
In early October, marine biologist Julieta Gomez rolled up her sleeve, reached into a jug of tumbling salt water, and pulled out a spool of twine. On it grew dozens of bull kelp starts, each little more than a brown speck. Their destination: the ocean. When Gomez attached twine like this to the seabed this summer, more than 100 juvenile kelp stipes appeared within the month and began reaching for the surface.
“They’re looking amazing,” she said.
Thanks to Gomez and her team, kelp is rebounding for the first time in a decade along the Sonoma coast, if even on a small scale. Their research is also providing insights that may be used to protect Central California’s kelp forests south of San Francisco. These, like others, are threatened by climate change, which is contributing to extreme ocean temperatures seen in recent years.
“We’re having success,” said Brent Hughes, a professor of biology at Sonoma State University who is restoring kelp in Sonoma, Mendocino and Marin counties. “We’re growing kelp out in the ocean. And now we’re ready to really expand this.”
The past two summers, Gomez and her colleagues donned scuba gear and dove into a briny cove north of Bodega Bay, with the spools in hand. The site, Fort Ross Cove, was once home to a lush underwater forest that provided habitat for marine life, supported commercial fisheries and stored carbon. Now, the kelp is replaced by armies of purple sea urchins, a casualty of a vast kelp forest collapse that began in 2014.
Fueled by a marine heat wave that year that scientists dubbed “the blob,” and key predators absent, urchins devoured more than 90% of bull kelp forests in Northern California. South of the San Francisco Bay, however, healthier kelp forests still coat the coasts and give life to California’s iconic sea otters.
At Fort Ross Cove, the scientists unraveled these inoculated lines of twine and secured them to the seabed. The hope was that these specks of young kelp would grow into towering stalks, and by fall’s end, release millions of reproductive spores. At the same time, commercial fishermen hand-removed purple urchins by the hundreds of thousands, to protect any new kelp that might appear, and scientists released millions of spores themselves.
Other scientists are using similar tactics in Marin and Mendocino counties. The experiments are small, on the order of a few acres each, but the results are promising. At another cove in Sonoma County, a canopy of bull kelp expanded modestly over the summer.
The projects are collaborations between the federal government, researchers, and scientists like Gomez with the nonprofit Greater Farallones Association. The organization protects an expansive marine sanctuary home to humpback whales, throngs of seabirds and great white sharks.
The return of kelp forests would broadly benefit the waters of Northern California. That would also protect coastlines from erosion, store planet-warming carbon dioxide and support the beleaguered abalone and red urchin fisheries.
Even with the recent success, however, it remains to be seen if these mighty underwater forests will ever be restored to their former glory in Northern California, or how long that might take.
Broadly, there are far too many purple urchins for divers to bag on the seafloor. Urchin “barrens” are vast, stretching through Oregon, and their natural predators are absent from the north coast: Sunflower stars are locally extinct due to a mysterious disease, and sea otters—a keystone species—haven’t returned to this part of the coast since they were hunted to extinction in the 19th century. Now, great white sharks limit their expansion north of the San Francisco Bay.
“It’s a lot of work to put people in the water and remove enough sea urchins to facilitate recovery,” said Joshua Smith, a research scientist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium who studies kelp forest restoration.
Beneath the surface, these swaying kelp forests create habitats for sea stars, rockfish, abalone, and more. Globally, kelp forest collapse is becoming more common due to climate change, pollution, overharvesting, and other factors.
But so is restoration.
Scientists are protecting or expanding kelp forests in Baja California, Southern California, Oregon and Washington’s Puget Sound. Locally, Hughes is also restoring kelp at two sites in Mendocino County.
Gina Contolini, another kelp restoration specialist with the Greater Farallones Association who coordinates urchin removal, said more projects like these are cropping up as scientists increasingly focus on these underwater forests. Researchers in California are also tying kelp restoration to global climate initiatives to store “blue carbon” in marine foliage.
“Kelp is a hot topic right now,” she said.
The research in Sonoma County has shown that scientists can grow kelp on twine on the north coast, where vicious storms and sharks limit their work, Hughes said. The benefit of the twine is that kelp can grow above the reach of hungry urchins.
But the research also shows that kelp forests can regrow directly on the seabed if enough urchins are removed from the equation.
To that end, the project employs commercial divers to remove purple urchins from two coves. Among them is Erik Owen, a fisherman based in Bodega Bay who dove for red urchins before kelp forests collapsed, taking the fishery with them. Red urchin uni is a valuable commodity used in foods like sushi, but not purple urchin. After hungry purple urchins mow down kelp forest, they lay dormant on the sea bed in a starved condition, with little value for divers.
In the last year, Owen and other divers have pulled roughly 650,000 urchins from Fort Ross Cove and another, Timber Cove, using only their hands or an underwater rake. The urchins are boated back to land and composted because they’re not a worthwhile food product.
They’ve made a big dent. But Contolini says there’s not much stopping purple urchins from crawling back into the research sites.
“There’s still millions of urchins at the larger site,” she said. “They’re just everywhere.”
People will always be slower at harvesting urchins than sunflower stars and sea otters, their natural predators. Both species are known to protect kelp forests, and enough sunflower stars can even convert urchin barrens back to forested canopies, said Jason Hodin, a research scientist with the University of Washington.
“A healthy kelp forest has both,” he said. “A functioning ecosystem has both.”
But scientists are still trying to understand the disease that has decimated sunflower stars in California, sea star wasting syndrome, since 2013.
It’s less clear if sea otters could also help convert barrens to bull kelp canopies. The Greater Farallones Association projects in Sonoma County don’t involve the possibility of sea otter restoration because these vast barrens of emaciated sea urchins couldn’t sustain otters, according to its official plan.
However, sea otters played an instrumental role in restoring kelp forests in Alaska after their reintroduction in the 1960s. Smith, the Monterey Aquarium researcher, said that example is comparable to Northern California.
It’s a controversial topic. While environmentalists cheer the return of this keystone species, commercial fishermen are anxious because otters are voracious feeders on valuable catch like Dungeness crab and abalone, along with urchins.
However, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concluded that reintroduction would be ecologically feasible, and that “substantial widespread economic impacts from the reintroduction of sea otters to Northern California and Oregon are unlikely.”
Hughes said sea otter reintroduction has more momentum now than he’s ever seen. But even if agencies approved the reintroduction of otters or sunflower stars, he said, it could take decades for them to help restore kelp forests at scale. That leaves scientists and fishermen to tackle this work alone.
“Right now,” Hughes said, “humans are the most efficient solution.”
2024 MediaNews Group, Inc. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Citation:
Braving sharks and hordes of urchins, scientists are growing kelp one forest at a time (2024, November 6)
retrieved 6 November 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-11-braving-sharks-hordes-urchins-scientists.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
A new statistical model could help to address the age-old question of how to price non-physical, intangible goods like data, say scientists.
In a new study published in Physical Review Research, King’s mathematicians used a statistical physics framework using games of chance to evaluate the potential monetary value of these assets. They hope this might help lay the foundation for how companies dealing in data can fairly price their products.
Traditionally, the standard economic theory of how to price goods fails with non-physical objects like intellectual property and data.
As Dr. Pierpaolo Vivo, author of the paper, with Dr. Alessia Annibale and Ph.D. student Luca Gamberi, explains, “The general theory of supply and demand for objects balances how much of the item is available for purchase with how willing people are to buy it. Factoring in the cost of raw materials and labor to produce the object, you can determine a fair price.”
“The issue that economists face is that this standard theory does not work for intangible objects—which can be reproduced at scale without costs. If I were to sell 10 computer chips, I would have to have enough raw materials and labor to create 10. If I sold a dataset, it could be copied and resold without effort, plus there will be no ‘wear and tear’ to bring the value down.”
This is a common problem for shops that offer discounts through programs like supermarket loyalty cards, where price reductions on goods are pegged to how much the personal data they collect from individual card holders will be worth.
Determining the price for intangible assets is further complicated when the sale could directly affect the seller’s market advantage—such as when a data company sells information on what could be a good investment in the stock market to others.
Expected wealth difference as a function of 𝑟, the length of the portion of string offered for sale with a fixed number of heads. Credit: Physical Review Research (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033250
Without a benchmark, it is difficult to predict that data’s monetary worth when it could both create a competitor and remove the seller’s “edge.” In response, many data companies or data valuation providers either develop narrow systems to ground the prices of niche types of data or provide a rule-of-thumb approach to satisfy customers but have little to do with the fundamental mechanisms that affect the price of the data.
To address this, Dr. Vivo and team analyzed the problem in the context of games of chance, such as poker and roulette—where there is an underlying random process, but some players may have extra information they use to their advantage.
“Players in a rigged game of roulette may suspect the dealer is not being fair, but unless they’ve recorded the outcomes of throws over a long period of time, they can’t use that information. If one player has it, they can build a mental map of how this bias might impact where the ball will fall, and bet on the most likely outcomes.
“If that player gives this information to the other competitors, their chance of winning goes down and they should be compensated for the loss.
“Using this idea, we have essentially been able to mathematically compute the fair price that these uninformed players should pay to offset the loss of edge of the seller, before they sell their data.”
This scenario is known as “informational asymmetry”—where not all the players are ignorant to the game being rigged and this information can be traded between the players to make the system fairer, or more advantageous to players in the know.
The application of this model is currently theoretical, but the roulette game can be used as an analogy for the financial market. The researchers suggest that the framework could determine the correct “equilibrium point” where sharing proprietary information creates a stronger competitor than yourself and could provide appropriate price scaling to compensate for lost competitive value.
“Ultimately, this is the first step in what we hope to be a general theory for how all data should be priced and get it to function just like the materials which shaped our understanding of money in the world.”
More information:
Luca Gamberi et al, Price of information in games of chance: A statistical physics approach, Physical Review Research (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033250
Citation:
New framework uses games of chance to put ‘price’ on intangible assets (2024, November 6)
retrieved 6 November 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-11-framework-games-chance-price-intangible.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.