Wednesday, December 25, 2024
Home Blog Page 12

How Sir Alex Ferguson built his last great Manchester United side

0
How Sir Alex Ferguson built his last great Manchester United side


June 2004. And Ferdinand is in another United dressing room hearing a speech showcasing another quintessential Ferguson character trait.

There are no tears this time, however.

Rather than losing his head and delivering the hairdryer, this time Ferguson was showing his bullish side.

An unwavering belief that he could, and would, rebuild the Reds – even in the face of the self-titled Special One.

“When Jose Mourinho came in to Chelsea in the summer of 2004 there were rumours that I and various other players might be leaving,” Ferdinand remembers.

“But he was like, ‘listen, we’re going to build this team and you’re going to be one of the main parts of it’.

“He was like, ‘just stay with me’. And he’s probably the only manager at that time in the world that I would have listened to like that.

“He said, ‘just trust me. I don’t get things wrong often when it’s football. Stay with me and we’ll get this right’.

“I was just like, ‘I’m there. I’m behind you, I believe in you.'”

Also on board in June of that summer were two men who were to have a huge impact on that 2008 Champions League triumph.

The first is a headline name.

A once-in-a-generation English talent hot off the back of a breakthrough Euro 2004.

A young forward by the name of Wayne Rooney whose transfer garnered headlines and newspaper column inches galore.

The second was an unheralded second coming. The return of Carlos Queiroz to the United fold as Ferguson’s assistant manager following an unsuccessful spell at Real Madrid.

Mourinho’s arrival in the Premier League, despite the Portuguese’s “Special One” proclamations, wasn’t all about him.

It was part of, and the start of, a wider internationalisation of the Premier League.

This was, in part, defined by the likes of Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich bringing an influx of money, and the resultant hike in transfer fees and wages. But it also saw the Premier League – and its managers – needing to embrace the global game.

Rooney was a precocious English talent from Croxteth in Liverpool who did his talking on the pitch. His impact, once he’d recovered from his broken foot at the Euros, was immediate.

In your face, in the goals and in the headlines.

Queiroz was the Portuguese assistant manager who spoke a handful of languages and, in time, would prove to be a crucial bridge between Ferguson’s east-end Glasgow roots and an increasingly cosmopolitan squad.

“At the time I came to the club, the Premier League and Man United was not that international,” former Serbia defender Nemanja Vidic told BBC Sport’s new documentary ‘Sir Alex’.

“Carlos was so smart,” ex-England midfielder Michael Carrick, another of Fergie’s signings during the pre-Moscow rebuild in 2006, added.

“He would take the coaching pretty much every day really, and lead the week and maybe a little bit more on the tactical side. He was quite dry at times, but focused and good at what he did. And he balanced off the boss particularly well.”

Prioritising speed – especially in attack – was key for Ferguson as, step-by-step, the rebuild on the road to Moscow started to take shape.

“Wayne and Cristiano had a massive impact, for sure,” Queiroz says. “It was part of that change that we had to bring in more speed to reduce the reaction time for our opponents. No doubt, those two kids, they changed completely the environment of that club.

“Sir Alex and I always used to think we’d be the first people at training. But, when those kids Cristiano and Wayne arrived at the club, they were there before us.”

Rooney and Ronaldo were part of Ferguson’s gift for reinvention that also included recruitment, with a specific brief: to bridge a gap between the Premier League and European football.

“Sir Alex said to me “I’m looking for someone who can bring me more information about European football,” Queiroz said.

“Someone who can communicate in different languages because in those days Manchester United started to have Spanish players, French players etc.

“My skills to communicate in those languages were good and then also we had the shift from Sunday to Tuesday.

“English football and culture on Sunday – I attack, you attack. Then on Tuesday in European football it is sometimes, wait and see. It is important to create traps. To wait, and catch opponents in their weaknesses.

“In England it was ‘I do my best, you do your best, and we’ll see’. But when you play Italians, when you play Spanish teams, it was not the same approach.

“When Sir Alex and I were having these discussions it was a case of keeping the balance inside the changing room to play in the English style at the weekend and then three days later in Europe, change our approach.

“When Sir Alex brought me in to Manchester United, one of the first conversations we had… I still remember his words. He said to me: ‘Carlos, you have to understand, you are here to help me win another Champions League.'”



Source link

an exclusive visit to the set of the finale

0
an exclusive visit to the set of the finale


grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC Ruth Jones and James Corden on the set of the final Gavin & Stacey.Stephen Fildes/BBC

Ruth Jones and James Corden, seen here on the set of the finale, have written every episode of Gavin & Stacey

“It can’t carry on after this,” explains James Corden. “It just can’t.”

Standing outside his mobile dressing room in a car park on the outskirts of Cardiff, the co-creator of Gavin & Stacey is explaining why the sitcom is ending after 17 years.

“Look, obviously there’s lots we can’t talk about. But Christmas Day, will be the last time that we ever see all these characters get together.”

He insists that it is “not up for debate” and the show which he also co-writes and stars in as Smithy, will not be, to use the show’s distinctive parlance, occurring again.

“There are some things happening in this special which really, really tell us that has to be it. We can’t see a way how it could go on. So that’s the reason to end it now.”

From 21:00 on Christmas Day around the country, this much-loved show, will be wrapped up amongst the wrapping paper.

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC Clapperboard for Gavin & StaceyStephen Fildes/BBC

It is just after 8am on a grey October morning. BBC News has been invited to spend a day watching one of the final ever filming days of Gavin & Stacey for a half-hour iPlayer special.

Our first stop is the make-up truck, where Ruth Jones, Nessa in the show, is having a Welsh dragon tattoo applied to her arm.

“The girls are always in before the boys,” she laughs.

“James Corden is in for five or six minutes at most. I’m in for an hour and a quarter. But the results speak for themselves,” she chortles, “And he misses out on the really, really dirty, disgusting gossip.”

One mirror along, Joanna Page is being turned into Stacey, although hearing her chat to the crew, she is pretty much Stacey to start with.

Her subjects for that morning’s session include Christmas decorations, a change in the weather (“a great topic”) and ear piercings (“at the end of filming I’m going to get another to mark that the whole thing is done”).

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC A close up of a fake Baby Neil tattoo on Ruth Jones's armStephen Fildes/BBC

Temporary tattoos mean that Ruth Jones spends 75 minutes in make-up every day of filming

James Corden arrives to use the beard clippers and perhaps inadvertently gives away one of the more telling little nuggets of detail about the show, when he explains his stubble must stay that length: “Because it’s only set over four days.”

Rob Brydon, already wearing Uncle Bryn’s finest brown party clothes, is ruthlessly teased when he arrives. The cast are heading out for a team curry that evening and it has been decided that he should pay, having managed to host a corporate event and squeeze in a voiceover gig around yesterday’s filming.

He pulls a that-won’t-be-happening face, before saying his major concern is when the dinner will finish, due to the early starts on set.

Soon he has the whole room laughing with his impression of Ronnie Corbett having his make-up done.

They are clearly a cast who love spending time with one another, even this early in the morning.

Jones has headed back to her trailer. When I walk past five minutes later, she is standing in the doorway holding a plate, which she tilts towards me: “See we do eat omelettes on this show,” she laughs, “Although this one was not made by Gwen.”

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC Joanna Page (Stacey) watching Rob Brydon (Uncle Bryn) limbo dance in Pam and Mick's house. Stephen Fildes/BBC

Joanna Page (Stacey) watching Rob Brydon (Uncle Bryn) limbo dance in Pam and Mick’s house

After a short minibus ride to the commuter village of Dinas Powys, the cast arrive at a very familiar detached house, in totally the wrong part of the country.

For 17 years, this is where scenes at Pam and Mick’s have been filmed, with the Vale of Glamorgan, doubling up for Essex.

Tents have been erected on the outside of the garage, to provide room for all the equipment and monitors.

We watch as a party scene involving limbo dancing, is filmed from every angle, as Bryn downs shots and Nessa gives Smithy a lesson in how to eat the Greek yogurt dish, tzatziki. (“Don’t use the cracker. Use the bread.”)

What is not clear, is how this follows on from the proposal cliff-hanger at the end of 2019 Christmas special, which was watched by 18.5 million people, more than a quarter of the UK population.

“Well, I can tell you is it isn’t set at Christmas,” shares James Corden, who explains having already set one Christmas Day special in Barry and one in Essex, it was felt that concept had been done.

“I can tell you it’s set after that moment. There’s no time jump, we’re not going back in time,” he adds.

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC Mathew Horne dancing at a partyStephen Fildes/BBC

Mathew Horne: “The whole thing is really emotionally charged… it’s the end of an era”

Perched between monitors and directors’ chairs, Jones explains one major change: “It’s 90 minutes. And all of the characters have got their own little story in there, which is lovely. Because if you are fond of a show, you love all the characters.

“It’s a bit like, I used to love the Wombles when I was little and I would love any story about any of the Wombles.”

However, Corden refutes the idea that the length now means it is a film. “I don’t want to say it’s a film because I think that brings expectations of scale and that I’m not sure our show could ever reach.”

Sitting on a sofa that has survived from the first series, actress Alison Steadman is loving being back in Pam’s domain, but says she is “really, really dreading” the final day of filming.

“It’s been such fun over the last 17 years,” she says. “People love it and stop me all the time to talk about it. I love Pam. She’s so crackers.”

She too is confident that all is going to end well, describing the finale as having “storylines that’ll go in a direction that people aren’t anticipating.”

At this point the house’s actual musical doorbell rings out, and we both laugh at the very Pam-ness of it all.

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC The cast of Gavin & Stacey filming their Christmas specialStephen Fildes/BBC

Pam and Mick’s house. The sofa belongs to real home owners, who have stopped using them, so they have to be put back in place for filming

Her onscreen husband Larry Lamb has spent much of the scene that is being filmed, standing behind Mick’s bar pouring shots, while wearing shorts.

He believes the show’s continued popularity is to do with the way: “Everybody in it represents an element of the life of contemporary Britain.

“Everybody’s in there. And if they’re not, somebody they know, and love is in there in that form.”

For Mathew Horne, having played Gavin for 17 years is throwing up all sorts of existential questions: “I’m putting to one side all my neuroses about that and to the ageing process.”

“It’s incredible because it is part of people’s upbringing, you know. And we were all in their homes as they were growing up, and now they’re adults and out in the world, and it’s extraordinary how much the show means to people. So yeah, it’s a lifetime for me, but it’s a lifetime for so many other people.”

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC Fan Lisa Lacking showing off her t-shirt of Pam, played by Alison Steadman.Stephen Fildes/BBC

Gavin & Stacey fan Lisa Lacking spent a week watching filming and staying in Stacey’s bedroom in the series on Trinity Street, Barry

At the end of the street, a crowd of about 50 fans have gathered to watch the last week of filming, including Lisa Lacking who has travelled down from Cheshire.

Through the fan community she has become friends with Brenda Kenyon, who owns the house which is used on screen as Stacey’s family home. And during this she is sleeping in the room used for Stacey’s bedroom.

Her hopes for the last episode are simple: “There’s got to be wedding.”

Rob Brydon is adamant that fans will be satisfied: “It’s a lovely ending to the show. There are definitely surprises. Things that we as the cast went, ‘What!'”

He also reveals that he cried whilst reading the script to his wife: “She thinks the ending is terrific.”

‘Chicken bhuna, lamb bhuna, prawn bhuna’

Back inside, the cast are becoming nostalgic. Corden points out the exact spot in the kitchen where Smithy made his curry order, before gesturing towards the stairs where Pam and Mick once appeared in matching kimonos, revealing that one crucial piece of the show will take place there.

With the 2019 Christmas special having been set in Wales, Joanna Page has not been in Pam and Mick’s for 15 years, so is bamboozled by the lay out of the house (“I don’t remember this mezzanine walkway”) but is making the most of every day.

“Knowing that this finally is the last one, sort of makes you savour everything just all the more.

“These moments that we get together are so special because they’re not going to happen again, in these circumstances, in these costumes, all of us together.”

Of all the cast, she has made off with the most souvenirs, ranging from, “an ornamental cat type thing that might be a fish” from Stacey’s house to almost the whole of the outfit she’s wearing (“these boots are pretty fab, this is a haul”).

grey placeholderStephen Fildes/BBC James Corden on setStephen Fildes/BBC

James Corden says that he hopes to give the fans “some sense of closure and finality”

What will not be occuring

Jones is hugging a cup of tea, waiting to be called for a scene where she will be dancing to Abba, and thinking about how close they are to the end, but how pleased they all are that it is on their terms.

“This is a full stop,” she says ruefully.

“I think we are very lucky to get to choose to end it, rather than to be told, ‘Sorry, we don’t want anymore.’ I think it’s lovely to be able to say a very healthy farewell to it.

Before we go, I ask James Corden, how he would like the show to be remembered.

He takes his time to really think about this and then talks at length about what he believes to be the show’s DNA, including “all the stuff that makes life good, which is friends, family and love”.

The conclusion to his thesis is: “I hope it’s remembered as a show that can make people feel good, that can bring comfort and a sense of warmth and history. That would be lovely if people spoke about it like that.”

Now he is waiting to see how the finale is received.

“If we can land the plane safely and just give it over to everybody else on Christmas Day, I don’t know, what a trip man, what an absolute trip it’s all been.”

Gavin & Stacey: The Making of the Finale, a 26-minute documentary, is available on the iPlayer now. The finale itself is broadcast at 21:00 GMT on Christmas Day on BBC One.



Source link

Amazon hit by ‘strike’ during holiday season scramble

0
Amazon hit by ‘strike’ during holiday season scramble


grey placeholderGetty Images Amazon delivery drivers walk the picket line outside Amazon delivery station as they went on strike in Skokie, Illinois on December 19 2024. Getty Images

One of America’s most powerful labour unions is staging a protest against Amazon, aiming to put pressure on the tech giant as it rushes out packages in the final run-up to Christmas.

The Teamsters union said Amazon delivery drivers at seven facilities in the US had walked off the job on Thursday, after the company refused to negotiate with the union about a labour contract.

Teamsters members were demonstrating at “hundreds” of other Amazon locations, according to the union, which described it as the “largest strike” in US history involving the firm.

The company, which employs roughly 800,000 people in its US delivery network, said its services would not be disrupted.

“What you see here are almost entirely outsiders — not Amazon employees or partners — and the suggestion otherwise is just another lie from the Teamsters,” Amazon said in a statement.

It was not clear how many people were participating in Thursday’s action, which was joined by members of the United Services Union (ver.di) in Germany.

In the US, the Teamsters union said thousands of Amazon workers were involved.

Overall, the group claims to represent “nearly 10,000” Amazon workers, after signing up thousands of people at about 10 locations across the country, many of them in the last few months.

The organisation has demanded recognition from Amazon, accusing the company of illegally ignoring its duty to negotiate collectively over pay and working conditions.

“They’ve pushed workers to the limit and now they’re paying the price. This strike is on them,” said the union’s general president, Sean O’Brien.

“If your package is delayed during the holidays, you can blame Amazon’s insatiable greed.”

Watch: Amazon workers across the US strike after company refuse to negotiate

The Teamsters is a storied US union, with more than one million members overall. It is known for winning robust contracts for members at firms such as delivery giant UPS.

Most of the Teamsters’ Amazon campaigns have involved drivers technically employed by third-party delivery firms that work with the tech giant.

Amazon denies that it is on the hook as an employer in those cases, a question that is currently the subject of legal dispute. Labour officials have preliminarily sided with the union on the issue in at least one instance.

Amazon employees at a major warehouse in Staten Island in New York have also agreed to affiliate with the Teamsters.

Their warehouse holds the distinction as the only Amazon location in the US where a union victory has been formally ratified by labour officials.

But it has seen little progress when it comes to contract negotiations since the 2022 vote. It was not among the locations listed to go on strike on Thursday.

Amazon, one of the largest employers in the US, has long faced criticism of its working conditions and been the target of activists hoping to make inroads among its workers.

Its fierce opposition to unionisation efforts has also been called into question.

But it is not the only business facing pressure over its refusal to come to the table about a contract years after the start of unionisation efforts.

At Starbucks, where the first coffee shop voted to unionise in 2021, workers also recently authorised a labour strike, accusing the company of dragging its feet on negotiations.



Source link

The town in Georgia where everyone has to own a gun

0
The town in Georgia where everyone has to own a gun


grey placeholderBBC James Rabun in his family's gun store, surrounded by different kinds of gunsBBC

Guns – from antique rifles to Glocks – are James Rabun’s family business

Kennesaw, Georgia, has all the small-town fixings one might imagine in the American South.

There’s the smell of baked biscuits wafting from Honeysuckle Biscuits & Bakery and the rumble of a nearby railroad train. It’s the kind of place where newlyweds leave hand-written thank-you cards in coffee shops, praising the “cozy” atmosphere.

But there’s another aspect of Kennesaw that some might find surprising – a city law from the 1980s that legally requires residents to own guns and ammo.

“It’s not like you go around wearing it on your hip like the Wild Wild West,” said Derek Easterling, the town’s three-term mayor and self-described “retired Navy guy”.

“We’re not going to go knock on your door and say, ‘Let me see your weapon.'”

Kennesaw’s gun law plainly states: “In order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition.”

Residents with mental or physical disabilities, felony convictions, or conflicting religious beliefs are exempt from the law.

To Mayor Easterling’s knowledge, and that of multiple local officials, there have been no prosecutions or arrests made for violating Article II, Sec 34-21, which came into law in 1982.

And no one that the BBC spoke to could say what the penalty would be for being found in violation.

Still, the mayor insisted: “It’s not a symbolic law. I’m not into things just for show.”

For some, the law is a source of pride, a nod to the city’s embrace of gun culture.

For others, it’s a source of embarrassment, a page in a chapter of history they wish to move beyond.

But the main belief amongst the townsfolk about the gun law is that it keeps Kennesaw safe.

Patrons eating pepperoni slices at the local pizza parlour will propose: “If anything, criminals need to be concerned, because if they break into your home, and you’re there, they don’t know what you got.”

There were no murders in 2023, according to Kennesaw Police Department data, but there were two gun-involved suicides.

Blake Weatherby, a groundskeeper at the Kennesaw First Baptist Church, has different thoughts on why violent crime might be low.

“It’s the attitude behind the guns here in Kennesaw that keep the gun crimes down, not the guns,” Mr Weatherby said.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s a gun or a fork or a fist or a high heel shoe. We protect ourselves and our neighbours.”

grey placeholderA vintage cash register is adorned with a sign that says "fight crime, shoot back"

Pat Ferris, who joined Kennesaw’s city council in 1984, two years after the law was passed, said the law was created to be “more of a political statement than anything”.

After Morton Grove, Illinois became the first US city to ban gun ownership, Kennesaw became the first city to require it, triggering national news headlines.

A 1982 opinion piece by the New York Times described Kennesaw officials as “jovial” over the law’s passage but noted that “Yankee criminologists” were not.

Penthouse Magazine ran the story on its cover page with the words Gun Town USA: An American Town Where It’s Illegal Not to Own a Gun printed over an image of a bikini-clad blonde woman.

Similar gun laws have been passed in at least five cities, including Gun Barrel City, Texas and Virgin, Utah.

In the 40 years since Kennesaw’s gun law was passed, Mr Ferris said, its existence has mostly faded from consciousness.

“I don’t know how many people even know that the ordinance exists,” he said.

grey placeholderBlake Weatherby in church

Blake Weatherby says that growing up, his father told him “if you’re a man, you’ve got to own a gun”

The same year the gun law took effect, Mr Weatherby, the church groundskeeper, was born.

He recalled a childhood where his dad would half-jokingly tell him: “I don’t care if you don’t like guns, it’s the law.”

“I was taught that if you’re a man, you’ve got to own a gun,” he said.

Now 42, he was 12 years old the first time he fired a weapon.

“I almost dropped it because it scared me so bad,” he said.

Mr Weatherby owned over 20 guns at one point but said now he doesn’t own any. He sold them over the years – including the one his dad left him when he died in 2005 – to overcome hard times.

“I needed gas more than guns,” he said.

One place he could’ve gone to sell his firearms is the Deercreek Gun Shop located on Kennesaw’s Main Street.

James Rabun, 36, has been working at the gun store ever since he graduated high school.

It’s the family business, he said, opened by his dad and grandad, both of whom can still be found there today; his dad in the back restoring firearms, his grandad in the front relaxing in a rocking chair.

For obvious reasons, Mr Rabun is a fan of Kennesaw’s gun law. It’s good for business.

“The cool thing about firearms”, he said with earnest enthusiasm, “is that people buy them for self-defence, but a lot of people like them like artwork or like bitcoin – things of scarcity.”

Among the dozens and dozens of weapons hanging on the wall for sale are double barrel black powder shotguns – akin to a musket – and a few “they-don’t-make-these-anymore” Winchester rifles from the 1800s.

grey placeholderA city street in Kennesaw, where an American flag - and a Confederate flag - are hung

Deercreek Gun Shop is located next to a Confederate memorabilia store

In Kennesaw, gun fandom has a broad reach that extends beyond gun shop owners and middle-aged men.

Cris Welsh, a mother of two teenaged daughters, is unabashed about her gun ownership. She hunts, is a member at a gun club, and shoots at the local gun range with her two girls.

“I’m a gun owner”, she admitted, listing off her inventory which includes “a Ruger carry pistol, a Baretta, a Glock, and about half a dozen shotguns”.

However, Ms Welsh is not fond of Kennesaw’s gun law.

“I’m embarrassed when I hear people talk about the gun law,” Ms Welsh said. “It’s just an old Kennesaw thing to hang onto.”

She wished that when outsiders thought of the city, they called to mind the parks and schools and community values – not the gun law “that makes people uncomfortable”.

“There’s so much more to Kennesaw,” she said.

City council member Madelyn Orochena agrees that the law is “something that people would prefer not to advertise”.

“It’s just a weird little factoid about our community,” she said.

“Residents will either roll their eyes in a bit of shame or laugh along about it.”



Source link

Corporate Transparency Act can be enforced, court rules. Here’s what it means for business owners.

0
Corporate Transparency Act can be enforced, court rules. Here’s what it means for business owners.


An anti-money laundering law called the Corporate Transparency Act, or CTA, appears to have been given new life after an appeals court on Monday determined its rules can be enforced as the case proceeds. The law requires small business owners to register with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, by Jan. 1, or potentially pay fines of up to $10,000. 

The registration rule had been on hold since Dec. 3, when a federal court in Texas issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting its enforcement. But on Monday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals lifted the order, ruling that the decision is in the “public’s urgent interest in combating financial crime and protecting our country’s national security.”

The CTA requires that the owners and part-owners of an estimated 32.6 million small businesses must register personal information with FinCEN, such as a photo ID and home address. With the court ruling that enforcement can proceed, many small business owners may scramble to register ahead of the Jan. 1, 2025 deadline, although businesses that started in 2024 were given 90 days to register. 

Some civil liberties groups decried the ruling, saying that the regulation represents governmental overreach.

“The government cannot be allowed to maintain this unconstitutional statute, which stretches beyond Congress’s proper authority to regulate Americans,” said the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a civil rights group, said in a statement emailed to CBS MoneyWatch. 

The Treasury Department did not immediately reply to a request for comment from CBS MoneyWatch.

Here’s what to know about the ruling and the CTA.

What is the Corporate Transparency Act, or CTA?

The CTA, an anti-money laundering statute passed in 2021, was intended to get a look inside shell companies and crack down on attempts by “criminals, organized crime rings, and other illicit actors to hide their identities and launder their money through the financial system,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said in 2022.

The rules first became effective in 2024, but gave existing businesses until Jan.1, 2025, to register, while businesses that began this year have 90 days to register. 

FinCEN is a bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury that investigates money laundering and other illegal financial activities. 

What is the CTA’s reporting rule? 

The reporting rule is the CTA’s Beneficial Ownership Information reporting requirement, which mandates small businesses to register the following with FinCEN, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 

  • Your company’s full legal name.
  • Its business address (P.O. boxes or lawyers’ offices aren’t accepted, the Chamber of Commerce says). 
  • The state where the company was formed or first registered.
  • A taxpayer identification number and an identity document, such as a filed Articles of Incorporation.
  • Beneficial owners’ full legal names and birth dates.
  • Beneficial owners’ home addresses.
  • A photocopy of beneficial owners’ U.S. driver’s license or passport.

How do businesses register under the CTA? 

Small businesses can file their beneficial ownership information reports at this link with FinCEN. 

What happens if I don’t register under the CTA? 

The penalties are up to $591 per day for failure to file, according to FinCEN. 

Businesses may also face criminal penalties of up to two years imprisonment and a fine of up to $10,000, the Chamber of Commerce notes. 

Which businesses are exempt from the CTA filing?

There are 23 types of businesses that are exempt from the beneficial ownership information filing, according to the Chamber of Commerce. These include many publicly traded companies and nonprofits, as well as some large operating companies.

Many types of banks and other financial services businesses don’t need to file, according to FinCEN. Some other types of businesses, such as many sole proprietorships, are also exempt, it noted. (A list and Q&A on exemptions can be seen here.)

What may happen next in the CTA case?

It’s unclear, but its possible that groups fighting against the regulation could seek relief from the U.S. Supreme Court or ask for the 5th Circuit for additional review, according to the National Law Review. 

contributed to this report.



Source link