Sunday, March 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 1063

JD Sports and Fullers warn Budget will push up prices

0
JD Sports and Fullers warn Budget will push up prices


Prices in shops and pubs will rise as a result of tax rises on businesses announced in the Budget, two bosses have warned.

Andy Higginson, chair of JD Sports and the British Retail Consortium, which represents supermarkets, said tax increases from April, including a rise in National Insurance, would lead to a jump in costs for shoppers.

Higher drinks prices could show in as little as six months, added Simon Emeny, the boss of Fullers, which owns about 400 pubs and hotels.

There has been a growing backlash from firms to the higher costs they face from the Budget, but chancellor Rachel Reeves has said “businesses will have to absorb some of this through profits”.

From April next year, employers will have to pay NI at 15% on salaries above £5,000, instead of 13.8% on salaries above £9,100 currently.

Minimum wages are also set to rise from April.

On Wednesday, Mr Higginson warned: “I’m guaranteeing you today, if these go through as they are without any sort of feathering, we’re going to see significant inflation in prices.”

He called on the government to “phase” in the increases in National Insurance and minimum wages for businesses “over the next two to three years” rather than in April next year.

“We just need to make sure that the immediate impact of all these things doesn’t come in one big lump and that the economy has time to absorb these changes in a way that doesn’t fuel inflation,” Mr Higginson told the BBC’s Today programme.

The JD Sports boss was one of more than 120 business leaders to sign a letter, published in The Times, backing Labour ahead of the general election and endorsing the party’s economic plans.

The chancellor’s budget included £40bn in total worth of tax rises.

More than half of these will be paid for by employers, with the National Insurance increase set to generate £25bn a year.

But there are concerns, the impact will still be felt by working people if firms decide to pass on costs through higher prices and if wage increases are restricted.

Mr Higginson said there was “plenty of time yet” but added it was “hard to see that the actions so far really match that pro-business rhetoric before the election”.

He said the Budget created a “worrying” backdrop for businesses at a time when economic growth is desperately needed.

“It doesn’t feel like a Budget for working people. It doesn’t feel like a Budget for growth. I think it will restrict investment,” added Fullers boss Mr Emeny.

The pub chain boss said that businesses still had not recovered profits fully post-Covid, and that the Budget measures announced cost an “extra £3.5bn” for the hospitality sector.

“There’s no way a sector like ours can carry this level of cost and just absorb it as profit,” he added.

Mr Emeny said that the combination of NI and minimum wage changes would cost his business an additional £8m, although the businesses latest results saw increased sales and profits on its food, drinks and hotels.

In the six months to September, Fullers increased profits before tax by 21% to £17.6m compared with the same time last year.

The average price of a pint of draught lager in the UK was £4.47 in September, according to the Office for National Statistics, but the British Beer and Pub Association recently revealed that landlords make 12p profit per pint.

One London pub boss has said he will likely raise the price of a pint as much as 40p as a result of the Budget.



Source link

Rail fare evasion review after penalties for ‘innocent mistakes’

0
Rail fare evasion review after penalties for ‘innocent mistakes’


An independent review of rail fare dodging punishments has been announced following reports of train companies taking disproportionate against passengers who have made innocent mistakes.

Transport Secretary Louise Haigh has asked the Office for Rail and Road (ORR) to look at how prosecutions and enforcement for rail fare evasion are dealt with.

Train operators have a number of tools to deal with passengers who have underpaid or not bought a ticket at all.

It is understood the government is not seeking to strip firms of powers to prosecute criminals who deliberately avoid paying. But there has been growing concern over action taken against people who misunderstand the ticketing system.

The independent review the government has announced will examine how clear ticketing terms and conditions are and how they are communicated to train users.

The most serious sanction is prosecution for fare evasion, which can land passengers with a magistrates court appearance and a serious criminal record.

A key question for the Office for Rail and Road will be when prosecution is the right step.

The Transport Secretary told a committee of MPs on Wednesday it was clear “people who’ve made genuine mistakes shouldn’t be prosecuted”.

“Make no mistake, deliberate fare-dodging has no place on our railways and must be tackled, but innocent people shouldn’t feel like a genuine mistake will land them in court,” Haigh added in a statement.

“An independent review is the right course of action, and will help restore passengers’ confidence in the system.”

Last month, government-owned Northern dropped all action against engineering graduate Sam Williamson, who was reported to the operator’s prosecutions and debt recovery department for using his 16-25 railcard for travel on a service to Manchester.

Mr Williamson faced prosecution for paying £1.90 less than he should have done despite admitting his error and offering to pay a fine or a new fare, prompting widespread criticism of Northern.

The Department for Transport instructed the company to review its ticketing policy to ensure it was clear and fair to passengers and asked it to examine details of similar cases.

Northern responded by withdrawing all live prosecutions against those pursued in similar circumstances and promised to review historical cases.

The terms and conditions of Mr Williamson’s railcard specified the discount was only valid for on-peak services where the original fare was £12 or more. However, despite the small-print, he was able to buy a ticket that informed him he could travel at “anytime”.

Stephanie Tobyn, ORR director of strategy, policy and reform, welcomed the review.

“It is important passengers are treated fairly and dealt with consistently and proportionately when ticketing issues arise, whilst also balancing the legitimate revenue protection interests of operators and taxpayers,” she added.



Source link

Tech Life: The dangerous job of online moderating

0
Tech Life: The dangerous job of online moderating



We hear from a former moderator in Kenya who was left traumatised by his previous job.



Source link

The Guardian stops posting on Elon Musk’s ‘toxic’ X

0
The Guardian stops posting on Elon Musk’s ‘toxic’ X


British newspaper group the Guardian has announced it will no longer post on X, formerly Twitter, saying it has become a “a toxic media platform”.

In a message to readers, it said the US presidential election “underlined” its concerns that its owner, Elon Musk, had been able to use X to “shape political discourse.”

Mr Musk strongly backed Donald Trump and has now been given a role cutting government spending in his incoming administration.

The BBC has contacted X for comment.

The Guardian said users would still be able to share articles and it was likely continue to embed X posts in its coverage of world events.

But it said the “benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives.”

“This is something we have been considering for a while given the often disturbing content promoted or found on the platform, including far-right conspiracy theories and racism,” it added.

X users have reacted with vitriol, with those who paid for prominent replies accusing it of “woke propaganda” and “virtue signalling”.

Mr Musk and the Guardian are far from political bed fellows – but even so its departure is likely to intensify questions about whether others will follow, as X and Mr Musk align themselves more with Donald Trump.

Its rivals already appear to be benefiting.

Meta’s Threads has continued to expand, and Bluesky, set up by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, briefly topped the download charts in the UK and US Apple App Stores on Wednesday, as users look to alternatives.

Its userbase has grown by four million in just two months, and Bluesky said in a post on Tuesday that it had picked up a million new users in the seven days since Trump’s win.

However it remains comparatively tiny, with 15 million users worldwide.



Source link

Beluga whale was Russian military asset

0
Beluga whale was Russian military asset


grey placeholderNorwegian Orca Survey Tame beluga whale in the seaNorwegian Orca Survey

The tame beluga whale approached Norwegian fishermen in 2019, wearing a harness, leading to speculation that it was an escaped Russian “spy whale”

The mystery as to why a beluga whale appeared off the coast of Norway wearing a harness may finally have been solved.

The tame white whale, which locals named Hvaldimir, made headlines five years ago amidst widespread speculation that it was a Russian spy.

Now an expert in the species says she believes the whale did indeed belong to the military and escaped from a naval base in the Arctic Circle.

But Dr Olga Shpak does not believe it was a spy. She believes the beluga was being trained to guard the base and fled because it was a “hooligan”.

Russia has always refused to confirm or deny that the beluga whale was trained by its military.

But Dr Shpak, who worked in Russia researching marine mammals from the 1990s until she returned to her native Ukraine in 2022, told BBC News: “For me it’s 100% (certain).”

Dr Shpak, whose account is based on conversations with friends and former colleagues in Russia, features in a BBC documentary, Secrets of the Spy Whale, which is now on BBC iPlayer and being shown on BBC Two on Wednesday at 21:00 GMT.

grey placeholderIplayer banner
grey placeholderJørgen Ree Wiiig The whale wearing a harnessJørgen Ree Wiiig

The beluga whale was wearing a harness which contained a mount for a camera

The mysterious whale first came to public attention five years ago when it approached fishermen off the northern coast of Norway.

“The whale starts rubbing against the boat,” Joar Hesten, one of the fishermen, says. “I heard about animals in distress that instinctively knew that they need help from humans. I was thinking that this is one smart whale.”

The sighting was unusual because the beluga was so tame and they’re rarely seen as far south. It was also wearing a harness, which had a mount for a camera, and bore the words, in English, “Equipment St Petersburg”.

Mr Hesten helped to remove the harness from the whale, which then swam to the nearby port of Hammerfest, where it lived for several months.

grey placeholderOxford Scientific Films The harness the whale was wearing, featuring the inscription, in English, Equipment St PetersburgOxford Scientific Films

The harness the beluga was wearing had the words “Equipment St Petersburg” on it.

Seemingly unable to catch live fish to eat, it charmed visitors by nudging at their cameras and even on one occasion returning a mobile phone.

“It was very obvious that this particular whale had been conditioned to be putting his nose on anything that looked like a target because he was doing it each time,” says Eve Jourdain, a researcher from the Norwegian Orca Survey.

“But we have no idea what kind of facility he was in, so we don’t know what he was trained for.”

Captivated by the whale’s story Norway made arrangements for the beluga to be monitored and fed. The name it was given – Hvaldimir – is a nod to hval which is Norwegian for whale, and the name of Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin.

grey placeholderOxford Scientific Films Head-and-shoulders photo of Dr Olga Shpak looking pensively ahead and wearing a dark jumperOxford Scientific Films

Dr Shpak says she is certain the beluga escaped from the Russian military programme but is not convinced it was a spy

Dr Shpak did not want to name her sources in Russia for their own safety but said she had been told that when the beluga surfaced in Norway, the Russian marine mammal community immediately identified it as one of theirs.

“Through the chain of vets and trainers the message came back – that they were missing a beluga called Andruha,” she says.

According to Dr Shpak, Andruha/Hvaldimir had first been captured in 2013 in the Sea of Okhotsk in Russia’s Far East. A year later it was moved from a facility owned by a dolphinarium in St Petersburg to the military programme in the Russian Arctic, where his trainers and vets remained in contact.

“I believe that when they started to work in open water, trusting this animal (not to swim away), the animal just gave up on them,” she says.

“What I’ve heard from the guys at the commercial dolphinarium who used to have him was that Andruha was smart, so a good choice to be trained. But at the same time, he was kind of like a hooligan – an active beluga – so they were not surprised that he gave up on (following) the boat and went where he wanted to.”

grey placeholderGoogle Aerial satellite image of what appear to be beluga whales in pens close to a marine base near MurmanskGoogle

Satellite images from near Murmansk in the Russian Arctic show what appear to be white whales in pens near a submarine base

Satellite images from near the Russian naval base in Murmansk show what could have been Hvaldimir/Andruha’s old home. Pens can clearly be seen in the water with what appear to be white whales inside.

“The location of the beluga whales very close to the submarines and the surface vessels might tell us that they are actually part of a guarding system,” says Thomas Nilsen, from Norwegian online newspaper The Barents Observer.

Russia, for its part, has never officially addressed the claim that Hvaldimir/Andruha was trained by its army. But it does have a long history of training marine mammals for military purposes.

Speaking in 2019, a Russian reserve colonel, Viktor Baranets, said: “If we were using this animal for spying, do you really think we’d attach a mobile phone number with the message ‘Please call this number’?”

grey placeholderMap showing the route thought to have been taken by the beluga whale, from the Russian Arctic to southern Scandinavia

The beluga whale travelled south over several years

Sadly, Hvaldimir/Andruha’s incredible story does not have a happy ending.

Having learned to feed himself, it spent several years travelling south along Norway’s coast and in May 2023 was even spotted off the coast of Sweden.

Then on September 1 2024 its body was found floating at sea, near the town of Risavika, on Norway’s south-western coast.

Had the long arm of Putin’s Russia caught up with the reluctant beluga?

It appears not. Despite some activist groups suggesting that the whale had been shot, that explanation has been dismissed by the Norwegian police.

They say there was nothing to suggest that human activity directly caused the beluga’s death. A post-mortem examination revealed that Hvaldimir/Andruha died after a stick became lodged in his mouth.



Source link