Wednesday, December 4, 2024
Home Blog Page 5

Scientists uncover new mollusk species co-habiting with an anemone in the North Atlantic abyss

0
Scientists uncover new mollusk species co-habiting with an anemone in the North Atlantic abyss


New deep-sea mollusc species cohabits with anemone
Fissidentalium aurae was discovered in Atlantic waters. Credit: British Antarctic Survey

A new species of tusk shell, a burrowing marine mollusk, has been discovered in deep, North Atlantic waters by scientists from the British Antarctic Survey and the Senckenberg Society for Nature Research. The newly discovered mollusk lives in the abyss—below 3,300m—with an anemone on its shell, an arrangement that has not been seen before in this region. The study is published in the journal Marine Biodiversity.

The team collected several specimens of the new tusk shell mollusk with anemones from the seafloor and observed many more using seafloor imaging. The changes the burrowing lifestyle of the mollusk, which is unable to burrow as deep as it could without its passenger.

Lead-author, Katrin Linse, Senior Biodiversity Biologist at BAS, says, “It was exciting to discover a , but realizing its living arrangement has not been seen before in the region in such deep waters was truly fascinating! It serves as a reminder that we know so little about life in the deep, particularly the way that it adapts and how species pull together to benefit from each other’s presence.”

Life in the abyss is hard. No sunlight reaches this depth and very few humans have been this deep in special submersibles. To investigate life on the abyssal ocean floor, Katrin Linse and colleagues on board the RV Sonne used a small net, known as an Agassiz trawl which can be deployed thousands of meters deep, to collect samples from the floor of the Labrador Sea between north-eastern Canada and western Greenland.

They collected several specimens of the new mollusk, which at 1.1 cm in diameter and 5.5 cm long is larger than its closest tusk shell relatives. It is slightly curved, with 60 ribs, and a member of the genus Fissidentalium which has over 60 known species. They named it Fissidentalium aurae, after the Latin word for breeze, referring to the windy conditions during the expedition.

Co-author Jenny Neuhaus, Ph.D. student at Senckenberg, sampled DNA from the anemone and checked its genetic barcode against known barcodes in genetic databases, resulting in no close match. The position of the anemone in the tree of life and its scientific name is a riddle still to be solved.

The association between a burrowing tusk with an anemone has been previously seen in the deep Pacific Ocean, but never in the Atlantic. The research underlines the benefit of deep-sea imagery to support descriptions of species with information on their habitat and ecology.

“The discovery of this beautiful species shows that the deep sea never ceases to surprise us,” says Neuhaus.

“Not only is it fascinating to scientists to find new species, but also sparks curiosity in the general public. Last week, our research earned a science award sponsored by the maritime city of Wilhelmshaven. We are grateful for this recognition, which emphasizes the importance of collaborative efforts in deep-sea research.”

More information:
Katrin Linse et al, A new species of Fissidentalium (Scaphopoda: Dentaliidae) in association with an actinostolid anemone from the abyssal Labrador Sea, Marine Biodiversity (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s12526-024-01481-1

Citation:
Scientists uncover new mollusk species co-habiting with an anemone in the North Atlantic abyss (2024, December 3)
retrieved 3 December 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-12-scientists-uncover-mollusk-species-habiting.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

AI will never replace ‘human touch’

0
AI will never replace ‘human touch’


Sony On the left, Hermen Hulst wears a denim jacket and smirks at the camera. On the right, Hideaki Nishino wears a PlayStation-branded gilet and looks serious. Sony

Hermen Hulst (left) and Hideaki Nishino (right) have been joint CEOs of Sony since June

PlayStation’s boss says artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to “revolutionise” gaming, but he believes it will never replace the “human touch” of games made by people.

Hermen Hulst and his co-CEO Hideaki Nishino spoke to the BBC as Sony celebrates the thirtieth anniversary of the console being launched.

The company has had a year marked by highs and lows, with the phenomenal success of its PlayStation 5 console and games offset by big job losses, in a pattern repeated across the industry.

Game developers have been hit by slowing demand after the pandemic – but some are also concerned about the impact of AI on jobs.

Advances in the technology have the potential to allow many of the mundane parts of game development to become automated.

But it has also caused deep unease that AI systems will also take over the creative process, with voice actors in the US striking over fears the tech could be used to replace them.

Mr Hulst acknowledged AI was changing gaming – but said there would always be a future for human developers.

“I suspect there will be a dual demand in gaming: one for AI-driven innovative experiences and another for handcrafted, thoughtful content,” he told the BBC.

“Striking the right balance between leveraging AI and preserving the human touch will be crucial.”

Discord over Concord

Since taking over in June, the two bosses have faced a number of difficult moments.

The much-anticipated shooting game Concord turned into a high-profile failure, with players who bought it being refunded, and the studio closed.

“Certain aspects of Concord were exceptional, but others did not land with enough players, and as a result we took the game offline,” Mr Hulst said at the time.

The firm also faced criticism over the £699.99 price tag for its new PlayStation 5 Pro console – hardware capable of playing games at higher fidelity.

The firm’s two-person leadership model has also raised eyebrows in the industry. Mr Hulst mostly oversees software and Mr Nishino looks after hardware.

“We can achieve greater focus in our respective areas and then come together to develop the best experiences for the PlayStation community,” said Mr Nishino.

They point to the example of surprise hit Astro Bot, which released to acclaim in September and has since received several game of the year nominations.

Getty Images A large model of several curvy white robots standing around a PS5 console, with some jumping up in the air. There are trophies surrounding them.Getty Images

Astro Bot is the joint highest-rated game of the year, according to reviews listed by aggregator Metacritic

“I cannot express how happy we are with the reception of Astro Bot,” Mr Hulst said.

Despite that success there are a number of issues for Sony to wrestle with.

Its handheld consoles haven’t historically fared as well as its home offerings, and the CEOs wouldn’t be drawn on whether there may be a new PlayStation Portable (PSP) in the future.

But Mr Nishino said the way players play games is changing, and pointed to its handheld PlayStation Portal – a cross between a controller and a screen – which he said has been “a huge success”.

And while previously it exclusively allowed players to stream games from a PS5 they already own, that is about to change.

“Recently, we just announced a beta programme… allowing Cloud streaming directly to the handheld,” he said.

“We’re always exploring various options for how players can play games.”

The bigger picture

One area where the firm wants to continue to expand into is turning games into films.

Early attempts by rivals – such as 1993’s Super Mario Bros and 1994’s Street Fighter – were panned by critics.

But recent adaptions, including movie versions of the Mario, Sonic and Pokemon franchises, have met with much more success.

Sony has shared in that with 2023 series The Last of Us, and 2022’s Uncharted, both based on games by Sony-owned developer Naughty Dog.

Getty Images Tom Holland wearing a sharp pinstripe black suit runs his fingers through his hair and stares intently at the camera.Getty Images

Uncharted stars Spider-Man actor Tom Holland as lead character Nathan Drake

And Mr Hulst said his vision for the future included more transfers to the big screen.

He pointed to 2018’s God of War, which is being developed as a show for Amazon Prime, as his favourite PlayStation game from the past 30 years.

“I am hoping to raise the PlayStation IP outside of just the gaming category and elevate it so it sits comfortably within the larger entertainment industry,” he said.

Sneaking into toy stores

While looking to the future, the company is also reflecting on the enduring appeal of the PlayStation console.

Though it originally launched in December 1994 in Japan, those in the UK and US had to wait until September 1995 to get their hands on it.

It has proved to be a runaway success, with Sony’s four home consoles prior to the PlayStation 5 each becoming one of the top ten best-selling gaming machines in history. The PS5 is on its way to joining them, too.

Getty Images Several children gather around a series of screens, with one holding a controller and playing a video game. The PlayStation console is attached to the screen and outputting a game. It is an old CRT screen.Getty Images

Children playing the original PlayStation console in 1999 in Japan

Despite his role as CEO, Mr Nishino said he did not have a home console when he started gaming – instead going to a friend’s house to play.

“I started to convince my parents to buy Nintendo’s Family Computer [known as the NES in the UK], but it was not an easy task,” he said.

“Together with my little brother, we finally convinced our parents to give us one, but I felt it took forever.”

For his joint CEO it was the other way round – he was prompted his mother, a toy store owner, to game.

“She was a bit scared of technology and would always call on me to demo the gaming devices to customers,” Mr Hulst said.

“After hours, I would sneak into the store”, he added.

“I surely developed my passion for games at this wonderful time in my life.”



Source link

Just a moment…

0


Just a moment…



Source link

Ex-Labour candidate Kevin Craig cleared over election bet

0
Ex-Labour candidate Kevin Craig cleared over election bet


Kevin Craig Kevin CraigKevin Craig

Kevin Craig lost the seat of Central Suffolk and North Ipswich to the Conservatives

A former Labour candidate has been cleared by the gambling watchdog, after he placed a bet that he would lose his bid to become an MP in this year’s general election.

Kevin Craig was suspended as Labour’s candidate for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich after it emerged the Gambling Commission had launched an investigation over the bet.

Mr Craig’s lawyer said he had “acted lawfully” and the commission were taking no further action.

He is now calling for politicians to be banned from betting on elections “in order that there is clarity and others do not have to endure the same fate”.

There is no law preventing politicians betting on elections.

But using confidential information to gain an advantage could amount to cheating under the Gambling Act, which is a criminal offence.

In a statement, Mr Craig’s lawyer said the commission’s decision was a “complete and total exoneration”.

“Mr Craig had no inside information and had no way of knowing who would win the election,” he said.

“It is widely recognised that some people place bets against the result they wish to happen, for example, betting against their football team. Such behaviour helps cushion the disappointment of a loss.”

The statement also criticised the Labour Party, saying Mr Craig had been “badly treated”.

“It is important to state that no investigation was undertaken before Kevin Craig’s name was released and he was then publicly suspended from the Labour Party,” his lawyer said.

“The first Kevin Craig knew of this matter was when he was publicly suspended and that should not have happened. There is no precedent for such actions.”

As well as suspending him, Labour also returned a £100,000 donation made by Mr Craig in 2023.

Mr Craig – a longstanding Labour donor – says he has now been readmitted to the party.

The Labour Party has been approached for comment.

Mr Craig has previously described the bet as a “stupid error” and said he planned to give any winnings to local charities.

He told GB News he had gambled £800 that he would lose Central Suffolk and North Ipswich to the Conservatives.

Tory candidate Patrick Spencer ultimately won the seat in July’s election, with a majority of 4,290.

The Gambling Commission confirmed it had closed its investigation into Mr Craig.

However, the regulator said a separate investigation into confidential information being used to gain an unfair advantage when betting on the date of the general election was ongoing.

Revelations about alleged bets on the date of the election rocked the Conservative election campaign, with a number of Tories also looked into by the commission.



Source link

Why has South Korea’s president suddenly declared martial law?

0
Why has South Korea’s president suddenly declared martial law?


Reuters Police in caps, facemasks and high-viz jackets stand guard in front of the gate of the National Assembly after South Korea's president declared martial lawReuters

Police stand guard at the gate of the National Assembly after South Korea’s president declared martial law

Under mounting political pressure, South Korea’s President Yoon Suk-yeol on Tuesday night declared martial law in the democratic country for the first time in more than 50 years.

His late-night pronouncement, made on national TV at 23:00 local time (14:00 GMT), mentioned national security and the threat from North Korea, but it soon became clear Yoon had made this drastic move in response to a series of political setbacks.

He was driven to the point of invoking martial law – temporary rule by the military – as a tactic to fend off the political attacks, observers say.

But it triggered immediate protests outside parliament and lawmakers voted down the measure, which they said was illegal, within hours.

How did it unfold?

After referring to the opposition’s political attacks, President Yoon on Tuesday night said he was declaring martial law to “crush anti-state forces that have been wreaking havoc”.

That put the military in charge temporarily – triggering the deployment of troops and police to parliament where helicopters were seen landing on the National Assembly’s roof.

The military also issued a statement declaring all gatherings by parliament and political organisation would be banned, while media publications would also fall under military control.

But South Korea’s political opposition immediately called Yoon’s declaration illegal and unconstitutional. The leader of Yoon’s own party, the conservative People’s Power Party, also called his act “the wrong move”.

Meanwhile, main opposition leader Lee Jae-myung called on his Democratic Party MPs to converge on the parliament to vote down the declaration.

He also called on ordinary South Koreans to show up at parliament in protest.

“Tanks, armoured personnel carriers and soldiers with guns and knives will rule the country… My fellow citizens, please come to the National Assembly.”

Hundreds heeded the call, rushing to gather outside the heavily- guarded parliament. Crowds of protesters chanted: “No martial law! No martial law.”

Local media broadcasting from the site showed some scuffles between protesters and police at the gates. But despite the heavy military presence, the tensions did not escalate into violence.

And lawmakers were also able to make their way around the barricades to get into the parliamentary voting chambers.

Shortly after 01:00 Wednesday local time, South Korea’s parliament, with 190 of its 300 members present, voted down the measure. President Yoon’s declaration of martial law was ruled invalid.

Reuters South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeolReuters

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declaring martial law in a national address on Tuesday night

How significant is martial law?

Martial law is temporary rule by military authorities in a time of emergency, when civil authorities are deemed unable to function.

The last time it was declared in South Korea was in 1979, when the country’s then long-term military dictator Park Chung-hee was assassinated during a coup.

It has never been invoked since the country became a parliamentary democracy in 1987.

But on Tuesday, Yoon pulled that trigger, saying in a national address he was trying to save South Korea from “anti-state forces”.

Yoon, who has taken a noticeably more hardline stance on North Korea than his predecessors, described the political opposition as North Korea sympathisers – without giving any evidence.

Under martial law, extra powers are given to the military and there is often a suspension of civil rights for citizens and rule of law standards and protections.

Reuters Aerial view shows lawmakers seated in voting chamber at National Assembly voting to block President Yoon's call for martial lawReuters

South Korea’s parliament met shortly after Yoon’s declaration to block the martial law measure

What has fired up the opposition?

Yoon was voted into office in May 2022, but has been a lame duck president since April when the opposition won a landslide in the country’s general election.

His government since then has not been able to pass the bills they wanted and have been reduced instead to vetoing bills passed by the opposition.

He has also seen a fall in voter standing, having been mired in several corruption scandals – including one involving the First Lady accepting a Dior bag, and another around stock manipulation.

Just last month he was forced to issue an apology on national TV, saying he was setting up an office overseeing the First Lady’s duties. But he rejected a wider investigation, which opposition parties had been calling for.

Then this week, the opposition proposed slashing budgets for his government – and budget bills cannot be vetoed.

At the same time, the opposition also moved to impeach cabinet members and several top prosecutors- including the head of the government’s audit agency – for failing to investigate the First Lady.

Reuters A crowd of protesters outside parliament chant 'No Martial law' and hold up the South Korean flag.Reuters

Many citizens turned out outside parliament on Tuesday night to protest against the sudden martial law declaration. Mass protests are a frequent and common political event in the country.

Reuters The leader of a key opposition party, the Democrats Party, stands with several other lawmakers while addressing media after parliament voted down martial law on Wednesday morningReuters

The leader of a key opposition party, the Democrats Party, addressing media after parliament voted down martial law on Wednesday morning

What now?

Yoon’s declaration caught many off guard – and it has been a fast-moving situation these past hours.

But the opposition was able to congregate quickly at parliament and had the numbers to vote down the martial law declaration.

And despite the heavy presence of troops and police in the capital, a takeover by the military has, it seems, not materialised.

Under South Korean law, the government must lift martial law if a majority in parliament demands it in a vote.

The same law also prohibits martial law command from arresting lawmakers.

It’s unclear what happens now. Some of the protesters gathered outside the assembly on Tuesday night had also been shouting: “Arrest Yoon Suk Yeol”.

But President Yoon’s rash action has stunned the country – which views itself as a thriving, modern democracy that has come far since its dictatorship days.

This is being viewed as the biggest challenge to that democratic society in decades.

As the speaker of parliament said on Wednesday: “We will protect democracy together with the people.”



Source link