Home Wild Life Readers deserve higher from well-liked science books

Readers deserve higher from well-liked science books

0


New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

Non-fiction publishing is failing its readers. It’s pumping out books with supposedly game-changing concepts, with out bothering to make sure fundamental accuracy. Those tomes have the semblance of educational paintings, however not one of the rigour.

My frustration about this has been development for years and after all exploded after I reviewed Yuval Noah Harari’s new e book Nexus, which is stuffed with ill-supported nonsense, together with a hopelessly incoherent definition of the concept that of data.

Believe Johann Hari: previously a journalist at The Unbiased, he used to be stuck plagiarising and resigned. He has since produced a string of unreliable books about clinical controversies. Misplaced Connections…



Supply hyperlink

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version